เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| เทคนิคเดลฟาย× | การวิเคราะห์เนื้อหา× | เทคนิคกลุ่มนามธรรม× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา≠ | ระเบียบวิธีสำรวจ | เชิงคุณภาพ | เชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1950s–1963 | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 | 1971 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation) | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research | André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven |
| ประเภท≠ | Iterative expert consensus technique | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique | Qualitative research method |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. DOI ↗ | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 | Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น≠ | Delphi method, Delphi survey, expert consensus method, iterative expert panel | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis | NGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | The Delphi technique is a structured, multi-round data collection method that harvests and refines expert opinion through iterative questionnaires and controlled feedback. Developed at RAND Corporation in the 1950s, it is designed to converge a dispersed expert panel toward a reliable consensus on complex, uncertain, or future-oriented questions — without the conformity pressures of face-to-face group discussion. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. | The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|
|