เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	Comparative Classic Grounded Theory	ทฤษฎีกราวด์เดดเชิงเปรียบเทียบแบบสรรสร้างนิยม
สาขาวิชา	เชิงคุณภาพ	เชิงคุณภาพ
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s	2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014)
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser	Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature
ประเภท	Qualitative theory-building design	Qualitative comparative research design
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory	Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	6	6
สรุป	Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions.	Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data.