เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การสังเกตในชั้นเรียน× | การวิเคราะห์วาทกรรม× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา≠ | วิธีการภาคสนาม | การวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1960s (Flanders Interaction Analysis); refined through 1990s–2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Ned Flanders (systematic interaction analysis); Robert Pianta et al. (CLASS system) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| ประเภท≠ | Qualitative and quantitative observational research | Method |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing Teaching Behavior. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น≠ | classroom observation research, structured classroom observation, instructional observation, lesson observation | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 6 | 2 |
| สรุป≠ | Classroom observation is a field research method in which a trained observer systematically watches, documents, and analyzes teaching and learning events as they occur in a real classroom setting. It can be structured (using a predefined coding instrument such as Flanders Interaction Analysis or CLASS), semi-structured, or open-ended (ethnographic notes), and is used across educational research, teacher professional development, school evaluation, and curriculum studies to generate ecologically valid evidence about instructional practice. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|