เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การวิเคราะห์ผลกระทบเชิงสาเหตุ× | Difference-in-Differences (DiD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา≠ | การอนุมานเชิงสาเหตุ | เศรษฐมิติ |
| ตระกูล | Regression model | Regression model |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2015 | 1994 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Kay H. Brodersen, Fabian Gallusser, Jim Koehler, Nicolas Remy, Steven L. Scott (Google) | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| ประเภท≠ | Bayesian causal inference / counterfactual forecasting | Causal inference / panel regression |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น≠ | CausalImpact, BSTS causal inference, Bayesian causal impact, counterfactual time-series analysis | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 5 | 5 |
| สรุป≠ | Causal Impact Analysis, introduced by Brodersen et al. (2015) at Google, uses Bayesian structural time-series models to estimate what would have happened to an outcome had an intervention never occurred. By constructing a probabilistic counterfactual from pre-treatment data and control covariates, it quantifies point-in-time and cumulative treatment effects with full posterior uncertainty intervals. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|