เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การทบทวนแบบ PRISMA โดยใช้ bibliometrix× | การทบทวนตามแนวทาง PRISMA× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | วิทยาศาสตรมิติ | วิทยาศาสตรมิติ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2017 (bibliometrix); 2009/2021 (PRISMA) | 2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix package); Moher et al. / Page et al. (PRISMA statement) | David Moher and PRISMA Group |
| ประเภท≠ | Software-assisted systematic review workflow | Structured reporting framework for systematic reviews |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | bibliometrix PRISMA review, R-bibliometrix systematic review, bibliometrix-enhanced evidence synthesis, bibliometrix-supported PRISMA review | PRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 5 | 5 |
| สรุป≠ | A bibliometrix-assisted PRISMA-based review combines the structured, transparent reporting framework of PRISMA with the quantitative science-mapping capabilities of the bibliometrix R package. The approach embeds bibliometric analyses — such as citation analysis, co-authorship mapping, and keyword co-occurrence — into the evidence-synthesis steps of a PRISMA-guided systematic review, enabling both rigorous literature screening and macro-level visualization of the intellectual landscape. | A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|