ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Anticipatory Governance Analysis×Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment×
สาขาวิชาScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด20082013
ผู้ริเริ่มDavid H. Guston, Daniel Barben, Erik Fisher, Cynthia SelinJack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, Phil Macnaghten
ประเภทGovernance framework and analytic approach for emerging technologiesNormative governance and reflexive-assessment process
แหล่งต้นตำรับGuston, D. H. (2014). Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218-242. DOI ↗Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นAnticipatory governance framework, Foresight-engagement-integration analysis, Reflexive technology governanceRRI assessment, Responsible innovation framework, AIRR assessment
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง44
สรุปAnticipatory governance is a framework for steering emerging technologies—nanotechnology, synthetic biology, AI—while their trajectories are still open, rather than waiting to react to harms after they have hardened. Developed by David Guston and colleagues at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University, it defines anticipatory governance as a broad societal capacity, distributed across the research enterprise and the public, built from three intertwined components: foresight, public engagement, and integration. The aim is not to predict the future but to build the reflexive capacity to imagine plausible futures and act on them wisely in the present.Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) assessment is an approach to governing science and innovation that asks not only whether a technology works but whether it is desirable, and seeks to align research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The influential Stilgoe-Owen-Macnaghten framework operationalises this through four dimensions—anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness (AIRR)—that are built into the innovation process so that direction and purpose, not just risk and product, become objects of deliberate care.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Anticipatory Governance Analysis · Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-25 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare