ScholarGate
Msaidizi
Process / pipelineSurvey / expert elicitation

Policy Delphi

The policy Delphi is a structured, iterative technique for eliciting and organising informed opinion on contested policy issues. Unlike the classical Delphi, which seeks consensus on a forecast, the policy Delphi is explicitly designed to generate the strongest possible opposing positions on a policy question and to expose the full range of options, supporting arguments and disagreements among a panel of knowledgeable stakeholders. Introduced by Murray Turoff in 1970, it conducts several anonymous rounds in which participants rate policy statements on dimensions such as desirability and feasibility, see aggregated feedback and the reasoning behind divergent views, and revise their positions — surfacing structured intelligence for decision-makers rather than a forced agreement.

Fungua katika MethodMindHivi karibuniTumia, linganisha, pata mwongozo
Zana na rasilimali
Pakua slaidi
Jifunze na uchunguze
VideoHivi karibuni

Soma mbinu kamili

Kwa wanachama pekee

Ingia kwa akaunti ya bure ili kusoma sehemu hii.

Ingia

Ramani ya mbinu

Jirani ya mbinu zinazohusiana — chagua nodi ili kuchunguza.

Vyanzo

  1. Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149–171. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7
  2. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.) (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 9780201042948

Jinsi ya kunukuu ukurasa huu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sw/public-policy/policy-delphi

Mbinu ipi?

Weka mbinu hii kando ya jamaa zake wa karibu na uzisome bega kwa bega — maktaba huweka vitabu mezani; uamuzi ni wako.

Linganisha bega kwa bega

Imerejelewa na

ScholarGatePolicy Delphi (Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation). Imepatikana 2026-06-24 kutoka https://scholargate.app/sw/public-policy/policy-delphi · Seti ya data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026