Linganisha mbinu

	Kielelezo cha Kano	AttrakDiff/UEQ	System Usability Scale
Nyanja	Mwingiliano wa Binadamu na Kompyuta	Mwingiliano wa Binadamu na Kompyuta	Mwingiliano wa Binadamu na Kompyuta
Familia	Hypothesis test	Hypothesis test	Hypothesis test
Mwaka wa asili	1984	2003	1986
Mwanzilishi	Noriaki Kano	Marc Hassenzahl (AttrakDiff), Martin Schrepp (UEQ)	John Brooke
Aina	Two-dimensional model categorizing product/service features by satisfaction impact	Questionnaire measuring pragmatic and hedonic quality dimensions	Rapid, post-use questionnaire scale for measuring perceived usability
Chanzo asilia	Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsjui, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), 147–156.	Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology (pp. 31–42). Kluwer Academic Publishers.	Brooke, J. (1986). System Usability Scale (SUS): A quick and dirty usability scale. In B. Shackel & S. J. Richardson (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 0-85066-375-X
Majina mbadala	Kano Analysis, Attractive-Performance-Basic Model	Hedonic Quality Assessment, Pragmatic vs. Hedonic, UEQ	SUS, System Usability Score
Zinazohusiana	3	4	4
Muhtasari	The Kano Model is a framework for categorizing product or service features based on their impact on customer satisfaction. Developed by Noriaki Kano, this model distinguishes three types of features: basic (must-have) features that satisfy minimally but cause significant dissatisfaction if absent; performance features that increase satisfaction proportionally with their level; and attractive (delightful) features that exceed expectations and generate disproportionate satisfaction. By classifying features using the Kano Model, product teams prioritize development efforts, balance risk and innovation, and design experiences that delight rather than merely satisfy.	AttrakDiff and the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) are assessment instruments for measuring user experience across multiple dimensions. AttrakDiff, developed by Marc Hassenzahl, evaluates the tension between pragmatic quality (functionality, usability, does the system do what I need?) and hedonic quality (beauty, emotional engagement, does it delight me?). The UEQ, developed by Schrepp and colleagues, extends this framework with additional dimensions including efficiency, perspicuity, stimulation, and novelty. Both instruments provide quantitative post-use assessment, complementing task-based usability testing with holistic experience evaluation.	The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a rapid, standardized 10-item questionnaire for measuring perceived system usability in a single summary score. Developed by John Brooke in 1986, SUS has become one of the most widely used post-use usability instruments in industry and research. The scale is administered after a user has interacted with a system, capturing perceived ease of use, learnability, error recovery, and overall satisfaction with a quick, economical assessment that correlates well with comprehensive usability testing.