Metodbevispost

Computerized adaptive test construct validity

Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Källpost

Citat kopierade ordagrant från metodens källpost. Ingen verifiering på källnivå härleds från dem.

Construct Validity in Computerized Adaptive Testing

Taxonomisk metodpost · latent-structure / psychometrics

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan. · URL
van der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.). (2010). Elements of Adaptive Testing. Springer. · ISBN 978-0387854595

Öppna fullständig metod

Kuraterade påståenden

Påståenden lagrade i bevisloggen, var och en med sin egen bedömning.

Inga kuraterade påståenden ännu

Denna vy hittar inte på en påståendebedömning när loggen saknar en.

Relaterade metoder

Genererade från metodgrafen och visade som maskinföreslagna relationer – inga bevispåståenden härleds.

Taxonomic bucketComputerized Adaptive Test Convergent Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test item response theorymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test measurement invariancemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketConfirmatory factor analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketConstruct Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketDifferential Item Functioningmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.