ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Skalan för akademisk själveffektivitet×Study Process Questionnaire×
ÄmnesområdePedagogisk psykologiPedagogisk psykologi
FamiljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ursprungsår19771987
UpphovspersonAlbert BanduraJohn Biggs
TypSelf-efficacy belief measurementSelf-report learning process inventory
UrsprungskällaBandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI ↗Biggs, J. B. (1987). Study Process Questionnaire: A New Instrument for Assessing Ways of Learning. Educational Research and Perspectives, 14(1), 1-8. link ↗
AliasASES, Self-Efficacy for Academic PerformanceSPQ, Learning Process Questionnaire, LPQ
Närliggande44
SammanfattningThe Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) measures students' beliefs about their capability to succeed in academic tasks. Grounded in Bandura's social cognitive theory, the instrument assesses perceived competence in diverse academic domains—understanding lectures, completing assignments, performing on exams, and engaging in scholarly work. High academic self-efficacy is a strong predictor of achievement, persistence, and resilience in the face of academic challenges.The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is a self-report instrument developed by John Biggs to identify the approaches and processes students use when learning. It assesses three dimensions: deep learning approach (seeking understanding and making connections), surface learning approach (memorizing and reproducing), and achieving/strategic approach (aiming for high grades). Understanding students' study processes helps educators identify learning challenges and tailor support.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Academic Self-Efficacy Scale · Study Process Questionnaire. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare