ScholarGate
Asistent

Discourse and the Archaeology of Knowledge

Foucault's claim that what can be thought and said in a period is governed by underlying rules of discourse — and his method for excavating them.

Pronađite temu uz PaperMindUskoroFind papers & topics
Tools & resources
Preuzmi slajdove
Learn & explore
VideoUskoro

Definition

A discourse, in Foucault's sense, is a regulated system of statements that produces the objects of which it speaks; the archaeology of knowledge is his method for uncovering the implicit rules that determine what counts as a serious, knowable statement in a given historical formation.

Scope

This topic covers Foucault's concept of discourse and his archaeological method: discursive formations, the rules of statement, and the historical a priori that organises knowledge. It does not cover the later genealogy of power, which is treated in its own topic.

Core questions

  • What rules decide what can count as knowledge?
  • How does discourse constitute its objects rather than describe them?
  • What does an archaeological, as opposed to interpretive, analysis seek?

Key theories

Discursive formations
Foucault analysed knowledge as organised into discursive formations governed by rules that determine which statements are possible, sayable, and true within a period.
The order of the human sciences
In The Order of Things he argued that successive epistemes set the conditions of possibility for knowledge, so the very figure of man is a recent historical formation.

History

In the 1960s Foucault developed an archaeological approach to knowledge, analysing the historical systems of rules behind the human sciences in The Order of Things (1966) and codifying the method in The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969). Cultural studies later adopted his concept of discourse, often via Stuart Hall's expositions, as a central analytic tool.

Debates

Archaeology versus interpretation
Foucault's refusal to seek hidden meanings or authorial intentions, attending instead to the rules of discourse, distinguishes his method from hermeneutic and ideological readings and remains contested.

Key figures

  • Michel Foucault
  • Stuart Hall

Related topics

Seminal works

  • foucault1970
  • foucault1972

Frequently asked questions

How is Foucault's discourse different from everyday talk?
It is not conversation but a structured field of statements, practices, and institutions that defines what can legitimately be known and said about a subject in a given era.

Methods for this concept

Related concepts