ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineSurvey / expert elicitation

Policy Delphi

The policy Delphi is a structured, iterative technique for eliciting and organising informed opinion on contested policy issues. Unlike the classical Delphi, which seeks consensus on a forecast, the policy Delphi is explicitly designed to generate the strongest possible opposing positions on a policy question and to expose the full range of options, supporting arguments and disagreements among a panel of knowledgeable stakeholders. Introduced by Murray Turoff in 1970, it conducts several anonymous rounds in which participants rate policy statements on dimensions such as desirability and feasibility, see aggregated feedback and the reasoning behind divergent views, and revise their positions — surfacing structured intelligence for decision-makers rather than a forced agreement.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroПримените, упоредите, добијте смернице
Алати и ресурси
Preuzmi slajdove
Учите и истражујте
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte celu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.

Prijavite se

Mapa metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.

Izvori

  1. Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149–171. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7
  2. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.) (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 9780201042948

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/public-policy/policy-delphi

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.

Uporedi uporedo

Citirana u

ScholarGatePolicy Delphi (Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/public-policy/policy-delphi · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026