Territorial Conflict Analysis
Territorial conflict analysis tests the proposition — central to the 'territorial explanation of war' — that what states fight over matters, and that disputes over territory are especially war-prone. Vasquez and Henehan (2001) operationalize this by coding disputes for the issue at stake (territory, policy, regime) and comparing how often each type escalates to war. The consistent finding that territorial disputes are more likely to lead to war than other kinds reframes the study of conflict around the contested issue rather than only the attributes of the disputants.
Pročitajte celu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.
Mapa metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.
Izvori
- Vasquez, J., & Henehan, M. T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138. DOI: 10.1177/0022343301038002001 ↗
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/international-relations/territorial-conflict-analysis
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.
- Dyadic Conflict AnalysisInternational Relations↔ uporedi
- Enduring Rivalry AnalysisInternational Relations↔ uporedi
- Militarized Interstate Dispute AnalysisInternational Relations↔ uporedi
Сличне методе
Uočili ste grešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravku →