Democratic Peace Analysis
Democratic peace analysis is the empirical study of the proposition that democracies rarely or never fight one another. Building on the dyadic research design crystallized by Maoz and Russett (1993), it codes the regime type of each state, constructs dyad-years, and models the probability of militarized conflict as a function of joint democracy alongside controls for power, contiguity, alliances, and trade. The approach has produced one of the most robust empirical regularities in international relations and a long debate over whether shared norms or institutional structures account for it.
Pročitajte celu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.
Mapa metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.
Izvori
- Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. DOI: 10.2307/2938740 ↗
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Empirical Analysis of the Democratic Peace. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/international-relations/democratic-peace-analysis
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.
- Dyadic Conflict AnalysisInternational Relations↔ uporedi
- Militarized Interstate Dispute AnalysisInternational Relations↔ uporedi
- Polity Score AnalysisInternational Relations↔ uporedi
Citirana u
Сличне методе
Uočili ste grešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravku →