Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Glasački ansambl× | Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating)× | Boosting× | Екстра дрвећа× | Slučajna šuma× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oblast | Mašinsko učenje | Mašinsko učenje | Mašinsko učenje | Mašinsko učenje | Mašinsko učenje |
| Porodica | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 1990s–2004 | 1996 | 1990–1997 | 2006 | 2001 |
| Tvorac≠ | Lam & Suen; Kuncheva, L. I. (systematic treatment) | Breiman, L. | Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y. | Geurts, P.; Ernst, D.; Wehenkel, L. | Breiman, L. |
| Tip≠ | Ensemble (combination of multiple classifiers by vote) | Ensemble meta-algorithm (variance reduction via bootstrap aggregation) | Sequential ensemble (iterative reweighting) | Ensemble (extremely randomized decision trees) | Ensemble (bagging of decision trees) |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Kuncheva, L. I. (2004). Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0-471-21078-8 | Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140. DOI ↗ | Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139. DOI ↗ | Geurts, P., Ernst, D. & Wehenkel, L. (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 63(1), 3–42. DOI ↗ | Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi≠ | majority voting classifier, hard voting, soft voting ensemble, plurality voting ensemble | Bootstrap Aggregating, bootstrap aggregation, bagged ensemble, bagged predictor | AdaBoost, gradient boosting, iterative reweighting ensemble, sequential ensemble | Extremely Randomized Trees, ExtraTreesClassifier, ExtraTreesRegressor, ET | Rastgele Orman (Random Forest), rastgele orman, random decision forest, bagged tree ensemble |
| Srodne≠ | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Sažetak≠ | A voting ensemble trains several diverse classifiers independently and combines their predictions by a vote: hard voting picks the class chosen by the most models, while soft voting averages their class-probability estimates, optionally with per-model weights. The combination usually outperforms any individual member, and requires no additional training after the base models are fitted. | Bagging, short for Bootstrap Aggregating, is an ensemble meta-algorithm introduced by Leo Breiman in 1996 that trains multiple copies of a base learner on independently drawn bootstrap samples of the training data and combines their predictions — by averaging for regression or majority vote for classification — to produce a final predictor with substantially lower variance than any single base learner. | Boosting is a sequential ensemble technique that converts many simple, barely-better-than-chance learners into a single highly accurate model by repeatedly focusing training on the examples that previous learners got wrong, then combining all learners with weights proportional to their individual accuracy. | Extra Trees (Extremely Randomized Trees), introduced by Geurts, Ernst, and Wehenkel in 2006, is an ensemble of decision trees that pushes randomisation further than Random Forest. Both the candidate features and the split thresholds are chosen completely at random at each node, eliminating the greedy search over thresholds. This extra randomness reduces variance, often matches or exceeds Random Forest accuracy, and runs substantially faster at training time. | Random Forest is an ensemble learning method, introduced by Leo Breiman in 2001, that grows many decision trees on bootstrap samples of the data and combines their votes to produce strong classification and regression. By pooling many slightly different trees, it produces more accurate and more stable predictions than any single tree. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|