Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Prostorna kontra-činjenična evaluacija uticaja (SCIE)× | Uskladiivanje rezultata sklonosti× | |
|---|---|---|
| Oblast≠ | Kauzalno zaključivanje | Istraživačka statistika |
| Porodica≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 2010s | 1983 |
| Tvorac≠ | Cerqua, Pellegrini, and regional-science scholars building on counterfactual econometrics | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Tip≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Method |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Cerqua, A., & Pellegrini, G. (2014). Do subsidies to private capital boost firms' growth? A multiple regression discontinuity design approach. Journal of Public Economics, 109, 114-126. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi≠ | SCIE, spatial CIE, place-based counterfactual evaluation, regional counterfactual analysis | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Srodne≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Sažetak≠ | Spatial Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (SCIE) is a family of quasi-experimental methods that estimate the causal effect of geographically targeted policies — such as EU Cohesion Funds, enterprise zones, or place-based subsidies — by constructing a spatial counterfactual: what outcomes the treated region would have experienced without the intervention, inferred from comparable untreated regions or from discontinuities at policy boundaries. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|