Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Robusna nomološka valditnost× | Konstruktna validnost× | |
|---|---|---|
| Oblast | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Porodica | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Godina nastanka | 1955 | 1955 |
| Tvorac≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tip≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evaluation framework |
| Temeljni izvor | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Srodne≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Sažetak≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|