ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Procena politike preskripcijskim rezultatom (Propensity Score Matching)×Uskladiivanje rezultata sklonosti×
OblastKauzalno zaključivanjeIstraživačka statistika
PorodicaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19971983
TvoracRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipQuasi-experimental matching estimatorMethod
Temeljni izvorRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Drugi naziviPSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Srodne63
SažetakPolicy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Preuzeto 2026-06-19 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare