Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Višestruka analiza metafora zasnovana na slučajevima× | Tematska analiza× | |
|---|---|---|
| Oblast≠ | Kvalitativno | Kvalitativno istraživanje |
| Porodica | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | 2006 |
| Tvorac≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Method |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi≠ | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Srodne≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Sažetak≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|