Controversy Mapping
Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
Prečítať celú metódu
Ak si chcete prečítať túto sekciu, prihláste sa s bezplatným účtom.
Mapa metód
Okolie príbuzných metód — vyberte uzol na preskúmanie.
Zdroje
- Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694 ↗
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
Ako citovať túto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sk/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping
Ktorá metóda?
Postavte túto metódu vedľa jej najbližších príbuzných a čítajte ich vedľa seba — knižnica vám knihy položí na stôl; voľba je na vás.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porovnať
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porovnať
- Social Construction of TechnologyScience Technology Studies↔ porovnať
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porovnať
Odkazujú sem
Podobné metódy
Našli ste na tejto stránke chybu? Nahláste ju alebo navrhnite opravu →