Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis
Bureaucratic reputation analysis is an analytical framework for explaining the behaviour, power and autonomy of public agencies through the lens of their reputation — the set of symbolic beliefs about an agency's capacities, intentions and history held by its many audiences. Developed by Daniel Carpenter, notably in his 2001 study of how U.S. executive agencies forged autonomy, and elaborated with George Krause, the framework treats reputation as a strategic asset that agencies cultivate and protect. It distinguishes performative, moral, technical and procedural dimensions of reputation and traces how reputational concerns drive what agencies do.
Prečítať celú metódu
Ak si chcete prečítať túto sekciu, prihláste sa s bezplatným účtom.
Mapa metód
Okolie príbuzných metód — vyberte uzol na preskúmanie.
Zdroje
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691070100
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x ↗
Ako citovať túto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis of Public Agencies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sk/public-administration/bureaucratic-reputation-analysis
Ktorá metóda?
Postavte túto metódu vedľa jej najbližších príbuzných a čítajte ich vedľa seba — knižnica vám knihy položí na stôl; voľba je na vás.
- New Public Management AssessmentPublic Administration↔ porovnať
- Regulatory Enforcement AnalysisPublic Administration↔ porovnať
- Transparency IndexPublic Administration↔ porovnať
- Whole-of-Government AnalysisPublic Administration↔ porovnať
Odkazujú sem
Podobné metódy
Našli ste na tejto stránke chybu? Nahláste ju alebo navrhnite opravu →