ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Etická komisia pre výskum (Institutional Review Board – IRB)×Informovaný súhlas vo výskume×
OdborEtika výskumuEtika výskumu
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku19741947
TvorcaU.S. Federal Requirement (National Research Act 1974); International adoption by WMA and research institutions globallyMultiple (Nuremberg Code 1947 first principle; formalized in Belmont Report 1979, Declaration of Helsinki 1964; US Common Rule 45 CFR 46)
TypStandardGuideline
Pôvodný zdrojU.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Office of the Federal Register. link ↗U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register. link ↗
Ďalšie názvyIRB, Research Ethics Committee, RECResearch Consent, Informed Consent Process
Príbuzné44
ZhrnutieThe Institutional Review Board (IRB) is the independent ethics committee established at research institutions to review and approve human subjects research, ensuring compliance with ethical principles and federal regulations. Created as a legal requirement by the U.S. National Research Act (1974) and now adopted globally, the IRB serves as the primary mechanism for protecting research subjects while enabling legitimate research to proceed. No human subjects research can begin without IRB approval.Informed consent is the cornerstone of ethical human subjects research, requiring researchers to disclose material information about a study and obtain voluntary agreement from subjects before participation. Established as the first principle of the Nuremberg Code (1947) and formalized in subsequent ethical frameworks (Declaration of Helsinki 1964, Belmont Report 1979), informed consent protects subject autonomy, enables risk-benefit assessment, and creates accountability. Effective informed consent requires far more than obtaining a signature—it demands clear communication, genuine comprehension, and authentic voluntariness.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: Institutional Review Board · Informed Consent in Research. Získané 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare