ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Identifikácia kauzality pomocou orientovaných acyklických grafov (do-kalkulus)×Analýza citlivosti na skryté skreslenie (Rosenbaumove hranice / E-hodnota)×
OdborKauzálna inferenciaKauzálna inferencia
RodinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok vzniku20092002
TvorcaJudea PearlPaul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)
TypCausal identification frameworkSensitivity analysis for causal inference
Pôvodný zdrojPearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679
Ďalšie názvydo-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus)Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity
Príbuzné55
ZhrnutieDAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths.Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: DAG Causal Identification · Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding. Získané 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare