ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Анализ чувствительности к скрытой предвзятости (границы Розенбаума / E-значение)×Локальный средний эффект воздействия (LATE / CACE)×
ОбластьПричинно-следственный выводПричинно-следственный вывод
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Год появления20021994
Автор методаPaul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
ТипSensitivity analysis for causal inferenceInstrumental-variable causal estimand
Основополагающий источникRosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
Другие названияRosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivityLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
Связанные55
СводкаSensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding · Local Average Treatment Effect. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare