ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Анализ мощности для исследований выживаемости×Регрессионная модель пропорциональных рисков Кокса×
ОбластьСтатистикаЭпидемиология
СемействоHypothesis testProcess / pipeline
Год появления19811972
Автор методаSir David Roxbee Cox
ТипSample size determination for survival outcomesSemi-parametric regression model
Основополагающий источникSchoenfeld, D. A. (1981). The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika, 68(1), 316–319. DOI ↗Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗
Другие названияlog-rank power analysis, cox regression power analysis, survival power analysis, Sağkalım Analizi Güç AnaliziCox regression, Cox PH model, proportional hazards model, CPH
Связанные65
СводкаPower analysis for survival studies determines how many participants — and how many observed events — are required so that a log-rank test or Cox regression has a sufficient probability of detecting a clinically meaningful difference in survival between groups. The foundational formulas were derived by Schoenfeld (1981) and Lachin (1981) and remain the standard approach in clinical trial planning.The Cox proportional hazards model is a semi-parametric regression method that estimates the effect of one or more covariates on the hazard — the instantaneous rate of an event such as death, relapse, or failure — while making no assumption about the shape of the baseline hazard function. Introduced by David Cox in 1972, it is the dominant tool for multivariable survival analysis in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Survival Analysis Power Analysis · Cox proportional hazards. Получено 2026-06-20 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare