Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Шкала организационной справедливости× | Шкала лидера-служителя× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Организационное поведение | Организационное поведение |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2001 | 2008 |
| Автор метода≠ | Jason Colquitt and Robert H. Moorman | Robert K. Greenleaf (concept); Robert C. Liden et al. (measurement scale) |
| Тип | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400. DOI ↗ | Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-177. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | OJS, Justice Climate Scale | SLS, Servant Leader Scale |
| Связанные | 5 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | The Organizational Justice Scale (OJS) measures employees' perceptions of fairness in organizational settings across four dimensions: distributive justice (fairness of outcomes), procedural justice (fairness of decision-making processes), interpersonal justice (respectful and dignified treatment), and informational justice (honest and adequate communication). Developed by Colquitt (2001) and building on earlier work by Moorman (1991), the OJS assesses how fairly employees perceive they and their work are treated, predicting organizational commitment, citizenship behavior, and turnover. | The Servant Leadership Scale (SLS), developed by Liden and colleagues in 2008, measures the extent to which leaders prioritize others' well-being and development. Building on Robert Greenleaf's 1970 concept of servant leadership, the SLS operationalizes servant leadership across seven dimensions: emotional healing, creating value for community, conceptual skills, empowering others, helping followers grow and succeed, putting followers first, and behaving ethically. The scale enables assessment of leadership styles that foster trust, engagement, and organizational effectiveness. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|