Сравнение методов

	Многоцентровое клиническое исследование II фазы	Клиническое исследование Фазы II
Область	Эпидемиология	Эпидемиология
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1970s–1980s (formalized in regulatory guidance; Simon two-stage design 1989)	1960s–1970s (formalised in US federal drug regulation)
Автор метода	Established through ICH and FDA regulatory frameworks; Simon two-stage design formalized by Richard Simon (1989)	U.S. Food and Drug Administration / ICH E8 guidelines (institutionalised framework)
Тип	Interventional clinical trial design	Interventional clinical study design
Основополагающий источник	International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). (2009). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: General Considerations for Clinical Studies E8(R1). ICH.	Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185392
Другие названия	multi-site phase II trial, phase 2 multicenter study, multicenter Phase IIA/IIB trial, multisite efficacy trial	Phase 2 trial, Phase II study, early efficacy trial, proof-of-concept trial
Связанные	6	6
Сводка	A multicenter phase II clinical trial is an interventional study conducted at two or more independent clinical sites to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of a new treatment in a defined patient population, following demonstrated tolerability in phase I. By pooling patients across sites, the design achieves the sample sizes needed to estimate response rates and identify promising signals before committing to the larger investment of a phase III confirmatory trial.	A Phase II clinical trial is the second stage in the drug or intervention development pipeline, conducted after Phase I safety testing. Its primary goal is to assess whether the intervention shows preliminary efficacy signals in a relevant patient population at the dose established in Phase I, while continuing to characterise the safety and tolerability profile. Phase II trials are generally smaller than Phase III confirmatory trials and serve as critical go/no-go decision points before large-scale investment.