ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Мэндельская рандомизация×Регрессионный разрывный дизайн (RDD)×
ОбластьПричинно-следственный выводПричинно-следственный вывод
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Год появления19972008
Автор методаGeorge Davey SmithImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
ТипGenetic instrumental variable frameworkQuasi-experimental causal design
Основополагающий источникDavey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014). Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R89-R98. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
Другие названияMRRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
Связанные25
СводкаMendelian randomization is a method for estimating causal effects of exposures on outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Introduced by George Davey Smith in the 1990s, it exploits Mendel's law of segregation to remove confounding bias. It has become a cornerstone technique in epidemiological causal inference.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Mendelian Randomization · Regression Discontinuity. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare