ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Dynamic Propensity Score Matching×Маргинальная структурная модель (MSM)×
ОбластьПричинно-следственный выводПричинно-следственный вывод
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Год появления1986-20102000
Автор методаRobins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingJames M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette Brumback
ТипSequential causal matchingCausal model / semiparametric weighting
Основополагающий источникLechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
Другие названияdynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMMSM, MSM-IPTW, marginal structural Cox model, weighted structural model
Связанные65
СводкаDynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.A marginal structural model is a causal modeling framework designed to estimate the effect of a time-varying treatment in the presence of time-varying confounders that are themselves affected by prior treatment. By reweighting observations with inverse probability of treatment weights, MSMs create a pseudo-population in which confounding is eliminated, enabling unbiased estimation of causal treatment contrasts even when standard regression adjustments would fail.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Marginal Structural Model. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare