Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Dynamic Propensity Score Matching× | Взвешивание по обратной вероятности лечения (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Причинно-следственный вывод | Причинно-следственный вывод |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Год появления≠ | 1986-2010 | 2000 |
| Автор метода≠ | Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matching | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Тип≠ | Sequential causal matching | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSM | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|