Сравнение методов

	Имитационное моделирование дискретного выбора	Модель смешанного логита
Область	Имитационное моделирование	Эконометрика
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Regression model
Год появления	1974 (McFadden's Nobel-cited logit); simulation extensions throughout 1990s–2000s	2000
Автор метода	Daniel McFadden (random utility theory); Kenneth Train (simulation methods)	Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train
Тип	Discrete choice modelling with Monte Carlo simulation	Random-parameters discrete choice model
Основополагающий источник	Train, K.E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.	Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-74738-7
Другие названия	stated preference simulation, SP simulation, revealed preference modelling, Ayrık Seçim Simülasyonu (Stated Preference / SP Simulation)	Random Parameters Logit, Mixed Multinomial Logit, Error Components Logit, Karma Logit Modeli
Связанные	5	3
Сводка	Discrete choice simulation is a behavioural modelling method — grounded in random utility theory formalised by Daniel McFadden in the 1970s and extended to simulation-based estimation by Kenneth Train — that estimates how individuals choose among mutually exclusive alternatives and then uses those estimated preference parameters to forecast how choice shares would shift under hypothetical policy or market scenarios. It is the dominant quantitative tool in transport demand analysis, health economics, environmental valuation, and marketing research.	The Mixed Logit model, introduced formally by McFadden and Train (2000) and elaborated in Train (2009), is a flexible discrete choice framework that allows preference parameters to vary randomly across decision-makers. By integrating standard logit probabilities over a mixing distribution of coefficients, it overcomes the restrictive independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) property and accommodates unobserved taste heterogeneity, panel data correlation, and complex substitution patterns across alternatives.