ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Байесовское взвешивание по обратной вероятности×Байесовское сопоставление по показателю склонности×
ОбластьПричинно-следственный выводПричинно-следственный вывод
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Год появления20152012
Автор методаSaarela, Stephens, Moodie & Klein (2015); Liao & Zigler (2020)Kaplan & Chen (2012); foundational PSM by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
ТипBayesian causal weighting estimatorBayesian causal inference / matching
Основополагающий источникSaarela, O., Stephens, D. A., Moodie, E. E. M., & Klein, M. B. (2015). On risk prediction and characterisation of treatment effects in a Bayesian framework using the propensity score. Statistics in Medicine, 34(14), 2170-2185. link ↗Kaplan, D., & Chen, J. (2012). A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study. Psychometrika, 77(3), 581-609. DOI ↗
Другие названияBayesian IPW, BIPW, Bayesian propensity-weighted estimation, Bayesian marginal structural weightingBayesian PSM, BPSM, Bayesian matching estimator, Bayesian propensity weighting
Связанные66
СводкаBayesian Inverse Probability Weighting (Bayesian IPW) extends the classical IPW estimator by placing prior distributions over the propensity-score model parameters and propagating that uncertainty into the causal-effect estimate. The result is a posterior distribution for the average treatment effect that fully accounts for both propensity-score estimation uncertainty and outcome-model uncertainty, enabling credible-interval inference rather than relying on asymptotic approximations.Bayesian Propensity Score Matching (Bayesian PSM) extends classical propensity score matching by placing a prior distribution over the propensity model parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the matching and outcome stages. Introduced formally by Kaplan and Chen (2012), it offers a principled account of estimation uncertainty that frequentist matching commonly ignores, and allows incorporation of substantive prior knowledge about treatment selection.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Bayesian Inverse Probability Weighting · Bayesian Propensity Score Matching. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare