Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Байесовское взвешивание по обратной вероятности× | Байесовский метод разности разностей (Bayesian Difference-in-Differences)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Причинно-следственный вывод | Причинно-следственный вывод |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Год появления≠ | 2015 | 2015-2023 |
| Автор метода≠ | Saarela, Stephens, Moodie & Klein (2015); Liao & Zigler (2020) | Li & Marchand (formal Bayesian DiD framework); Brodersen et al. (Bayesian causal inference in time series) |
| Тип≠ | Bayesian causal weighting estimator | Bayesian causal inference / panel regression |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Saarela, O., Stephens, D. A., Moodie, E. E. M., & Klein, M. B. (2015). On risk prediction and characterisation of treatment effects in a Bayesian framework using the propensity score. Statistics in Medicine, 34(14), 2170-2185. link ↗ | Li, F., & Marchand, J. (2023). Bayesian inference for difference-in-differences. Econometrics Journal, 26(3), 509-529. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | Bayesian IPW, BIPW, Bayesian propensity-weighted estimation, Bayesian marginal structural weighting | Bayesian DiD, Bayes DiD, Bayesian diff-in-diff, Bayesian panel causal estimator |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | Bayesian Inverse Probability Weighting (Bayesian IPW) extends the classical IPW estimator by placing prior distributions over the propensity-score model parameters and propagating that uncertainty into the causal-effect estimate. The result is a posterior distribution for the average treatment effect that fully accounts for both propensity-score estimation uncertainty and outcome-model uncertainty, enabling credible-interval inference rather than relying on asymptotic approximations. | Bayesian Difference-in-Differences applies Bayesian statistical inference to the classic DiD design, replacing frequentist point estimates with full posterior distributions over the treatment effect. This yields not only an estimate of the causal effect but also a coherent probability statement about its magnitude and uncertainty, making it especially useful when sample sizes are modest or informative prior knowledge is available. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|