Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Шкала академической самоэффективности× | Шкала диспозиций критического мышления× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Педагогическая психология | Педагогическая психология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1977 | 1992 |
| Автор метода≠ | Albert Bandura | Peter Facione |
| Тип≠ | Self-efficacy belief measurement | Critical thinking propensity measurement |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI ↗ | Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. F. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Insight Assessment, Millbrae, CA. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | ASES, Self-Efficacy for Academic Performance | CTDS, California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, CCTDI |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) measures students' beliefs about their capability to succeed in academic tasks. Grounded in Bandura's social cognitive theory, the instrument assesses perceived competence in diverse academic domains—understanding lectures, completing assignments, performing on exams, and engaging in scholarly work. High academic self-efficacy is a strong predictor of achievement, persistence, and resilience in the face of academic challenges. | The Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (CTDS), exemplified by the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), measures the extent to which individuals exhibit cognitive dispositions conducive to critical thinking. Developed by Facione (1992), it assesses dimensions including truth-seeking, open-mindedness, analytical orientation, self-confidence, systematic approach, and inquisitiveness. Critical thinking dispositions—the habits of mind and values that support rigorous reasoning—are distinct from but complementary to critical thinking skills. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|