Redaction Criticism
Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.
Citește metoda completă
Autentifică-te cu un cont gratuit pentru a citi această secțiune.
Harta metodelor
Vecinătatea metodelor înrudite — selectați un nod pentru a explora.
Surse
- Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
- Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link ↗
Cum se citează această pagină
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ro/religious-studies/redaction-criticism
Ce metodă?
Așezați această metodă lângă cele mai apropiate rude și citiți-le alăturat — biblioteca pune cărțile pe masă; alegerea vă aparține.
- Form CriticismReligious Studies↔ compară
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ compară
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ compară
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ compară
Citat de
Metode similare
Ai observat o problemă pe această pagină? Raportează sau sugerează o corectură →