Form Criticism
Form criticism (Formgeschichte) studies the small, originally oral units that make up the biblical text, asking what genre each unit belongs to, what social setting gave rise to it, and how it developed before reaching written form. Hermann Gunkel pioneered the approach for the Hebrew Bible, treating the narratives of Genesis and the Psalms as folk forms shaped by communal use, while Rudolf Bultmann and Martin Dibelius applied it to the Gospels, analyzing the sayings and stories about Jesus as units that circulated and were shaped by the early church before the evangelists wrote. Bultmann's 1921 History of the Synoptic Tradition is the method's most systematic statement. The core conviction is that form and function are linked: a unit's genre points to the recurring life-setting, the Sitz im Leben, in which the community used it.
Citește metoda completă
Autentifică-te cu un cont gratuit pentru a citi această secțiune.
Harta metodelor
Vecinătatea metodelor înrudite — selectați un nod pentru a explora.
Surse
- Bultmann, R. (1963). The History of the Synoptic Tradition (trans. J. Marsh). New York: Harper & Row. [German original 1921]. ISBN: 9780060611729
- Gunkel, H. (1987). The Legends of Genesis: The Biblical Saga and History (trans. W. H. Carruth). New York: Schocken Books. [German original 1901]. ISBN: 9780805200867
Cum se citează această pagină
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Form Criticism (Formgeschichte: Genre Classification and Tradition History). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ro/religious-studies/form-criticism
Ce metodă?
Așezați această metodă lângă cele mai apropiate rude și citiți-le alăturat — biblioteca pune cărțile pe masă; alegerea vă aparține.
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ compară
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ compară
- Redaction CriticismReligious Studies↔ compară
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ compară
Citat de
Metode similare
Ai observat o problemă pe această pagină? Raportează sau sugerează o corectură →