Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza robustă a căilor× | Analiza de cale (Path Analysis)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Statistică | Statistică |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1998 | 1921 |
| Autorul original≠ | Yuan & Bentler (robust SEM/path framework); Huber (M-estimation foundation) | Sewall Wright |
| Tip≠ | Causal path modeling with robust estimation | Causal / mediation model |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Yuan, K.-H. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Robust mean and covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51(1), 63–88. DOI ↗ | Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20(7), 557–585. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | robust PA, path analysis with robust standard errors, robust causal path modeling, robust structural path modeling | PA, path coefficient analysis, observed-variable SEM, causal path modeling |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Robust path analysis applies robust estimation — such as sandwich standard errors or M-estimation — to path models that specify directed causal relationships among observed variables. It preserves valid inference about path coefficients and indirect effects when data violate normality, contain outliers, or exhibit heteroscedasticity that would distort conventional standard errors. | Path analysis tests a researcher-specified causal diagram among observed variables by decomposing their intercorrelations into direct effects, indirect (mediated) effects, and spurious associations. Developed by Sewall Wright in 1921, it is the observed-variable special case of structural equation modeling and remains a standard tool for theory-driven multivariate causal inference. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|