Compară metode

	Scala de pregătire pentru învățământul interprofesional (RIPLS)	Scala de Colaborare Interprofesională (IPCS)
Domeniu	Educație pentru sănătate	Educație pentru sănătate
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Anul apariției	1999	2003–2005
Autorul original	Gail Parsell & John Bligh	Hind et al. / Barr et al.
Tip	Self-report questionnaire	Self-report questionnaire
Sursa seminală	Parsell, G. & Bligh, J. (1999). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ 33(2): 95–100.	Hind, M., Norman, I., Compton, S. E., Worral-Davies, A., Coad, S., Marples, R., ... Drey, N. (2003). Interprofessional perceptions of health care students. J Interprof Care 17(1): 21–34.
Denumiri alternative	Readiness for IPL, RIPLS Scale	Collaboration Scale, Team Collaboration Index, Interprofessional Teamwork Scale
Înrudite	4	4
Rezumat	The RIPLS is a 19-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure healthcare students' attitudes and readiness toward interprofessional learning and collaboration. Developed by Parsell and Bligh in 1999, it assesses three core dimensions of interprofessional readiness: teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and recognition of roles and responsibilities across professions. The RIPLS is widely used in health professions education to evaluate the effectiveness of interprofessional education initiatives.	The IPCS is a self-report questionnaire measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors regarding interprofessional collaboration and teamwork. Developed through research by Hind and colleagues in 2003 and refined in subsequent interprofessional education studies, the IPCS evaluates perceived teamwork quality, interdependence, communication effectiveness, and shared decision-making across professional boundaries. It is used in clinical and educational settings to assess collaboration climate, evaluate the impact of team interventions, and identify professional groups' differing perspectives on teamwork.