Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Designul regresiei cu discontinuitate în cercetarea educațională× | Potrivirea scorului de propensitate× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Inferență cauzală | Statistică pentru cercetare |
| Familie≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1960 (origination); 1999-2010 (education economics canon) | 1983 |
| Autorul original≠ | Thistlethwaite & Campbell (1960); popularized in education economics by Angrist & Lavy (1999), Lee & Lemieux (2010) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Tip≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281-355. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | RDD in education, education RD design, sharp RDD education, score-cutoff design | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | Regression discontinuity design (RDD) in education research exploits a score-based eligibility cutoff — such as a test score threshold, GPA requirement, or age cutoff — to estimate the causal effect of a program, intervention, or policy on student or school outcomes. Units just below and just above the cutoff are treated as near-randomly assigned, enabling credible causal inference without a randomized trial. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|