ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Studiu clinic pragmatic de Faza II×Studiu clinic de Faza I×
DomeniuEpidemiologieEpidemiologie
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anul aparițieiPragmatic framework: 1967; Phase II application: 1990s–2000s1960s (formal regulatory framework established ~1963–1970s)
Autorul originalConceptual basis: Daniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch (pragmatic vs. explanatory distinction, 1967); applied to Phase II context by drug developers and trialists from the 1990s onwardRegulatory and clinical pharmacology community; formalized in U.S. FDA IND regulations (1963) and ICH guidelines
TipInterventional study designInterventional clinical study design
Sursa seminalăSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Storer, B. E. (1989). Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. Biometrics, 45(3), 925–937. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativepragmatic Phase II trial, real-world Phase II trial, Phase II pragmatic RCT, Phase IIb pragmatic trialPhase 1 trial, first-in-human study, FIH study, dose-escalation study
Înrudite66
RezumatA pragmatic Phase II clinical trial is an early-to-mid-stage interventional study that evaluates a new treatment's preliminary efficacy and safety under conditions that approximate real-world clinical practice rather than tightly controlled experimental settings. It sits between pure explanatory Phase II trials and large pragmatic Phase III confirmatory trials, prioritising practical feasibility and clinical relevance while still generating the signal needed to justify further development.A Phase I clinical trial is the first stage of human testing for a new drug, biologic, or intervention. Its primary objective is to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) rather than therapeutic efficacy. Small cohorts of participants — typically healthy volunteers or patients with advanced disease — receive sequentially increasing doses to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) that define the boundary for subsequent trials.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Pragmatic phase II clinical trial · Phase I Clinical Trial. Preluat la 2026-06-20 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare