Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza puterii statistice pentru studii de supraviețuire× | Testul Log-Rank pentru Compararea Curbei de Supraviețuire× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu≠ | Statistică | Supraviețuire |
| Familie≠ | Hypothesis test | Survival analysis |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1981 | 1966 |
| Autorul original≠ | — | Mantel, N. |
| Tip≠ | Sample size determination for survival outcomes | Non-parametric hypothesis test |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Schoenfeld, D. A. (1981). The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika, 68(1), 316–319. DOI ↗ | Mantel, N. (1966). Evaluation of Survival Data and Two New Rank Order Statistics Arising in Its Consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 50(3), 163–170. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | log-rank power analysis, cox regression power analysis, survival power analysis, Sağkalım Analizi Güç Analizi | Mantel log-rank test, Mantel-Cox test, log-rank sağkalım testi, Log-Rank Testi |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Rezumat≠ | Power analysis for survival studies determines how many participants — and how many observed events — are required so that a log-rank test or Cox regression has a sufficient probability of detecting a clinically meaningful difference in survival between groups. The foundational formulas were derived by Schoenfeld (1981) and Lachin (1981) and remain the standard approach in clinical trial planning. | The log-rank test, developed by Nathan Mantel in 1966, is a non-parametric hypothesis test that compares the overall survival experience of two or more groups throughout the entire follow-up period. It is the standard companion to Kaplan-Meier curves and determines whether observed differences between curves are statistically meaningful. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|