ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Randomizare Mendeliană×Designul de discontinuitate a regresiei (RDD)×
DomeniuInferență cauzalăInferență cauzală
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Anul apariției19972008
Autorul originalGeorge Davey SmithImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
TipGenetic instrumental variable frameworkQuasi-experimental causal design
Sursa seminalăDavey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014). Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R89-R98. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
Denumiri alternativeMRRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
Înrudite25
RezumatMendelian randomization is a method for estimating causal effects of exposures on outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Introduced by George Davey Smith in the 1990s, it exploits Mendel's law of segregation to remove confounding bias. It has become a cornerstone technique in epidemiological causal inference.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 3 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Mendelian Randomization · Regression Discontinuity. Preluat la 2026-06-18 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare