Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Testul de cointegrare Maki× | Panel DF-GLS× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Econometrie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2012 | 1996 |
| Autorul original≠ | Darshana Maki | Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock (adapted to panels) |
| Tip≠ | Structural-break test | Stationarity test |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Maki, D. (2012). Tests for cointegration allowing for an unknown number of breaks. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2011-2015. DOI ↗ | Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometric Reviews, 13(4), 469-497. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Structural-break cointegration test | Panel unit-root test |
| Înrudite | 3 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Maki cointegration test extends cointegration testing to allow for an unknown number of endogenously-determined structural breaks in the cointegrating relationship. Introduced by Maki (2012), it builds on Gregory and Hansen (1996), enabling detection of cointegration even when relationships shift due to policy changes, institutional reforms, or fundamental regime shifts. This is essential for applied time-series work where structural change is common. | Panel DF-GLS extends the Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock (1996) GLS unit-root test to panel data, combining cross-sectional and time-series information to test whether variables contain unit roots. Introduced by Hadri and colleagues (2005), it is more powerful than standard panel unit-root tests (IPS, LLC) due to its GLS detrending approach. This test is essential for establishing stationarity before fitting cointegration or dynamic panel models. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|