Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Validitatea nomologică longitudinală× | Nomological Validity× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihometrie | Psihometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s | 1955 |
| Autorul original≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onward | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tip≠ | Validity evaluation | Validity evidence framework |
| Sursa seminală | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validity | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time. | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|