Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Grații prin Diferențiere Automată× | Modelul Bates× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Finanțe cantitative | Finanțe cantitative |
| Familie≠ | Machine learning | Regression model |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2008 | 1996 |
| Autorul original≠ | Mike Giles, Iman Homescu | David S. Bates |
| Tip≠ | Sensitivity Analysis | Equity/FX Model |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Giles, M. B. (2008). Adjoint code by automatic differentiation. Journal of Computational Finance, 12(1), 1-18. link ↗ | Bates, D. S. (1996). Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit in Deutsche Mark options. Review of Financial Studies, 9(1), 69-107. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | AD Greeks, Algorithmic Differentiation, Autodiff | SVJ Model, Jump Diffusion |
| Înrudite≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Automatic differentiation (AD) is a computational technique for computing derivatives (Greeks) by differentiating the computer code that computes the option price. AD avoids manual derivation of formulas and finite-difference approximations, yielding exact sensitivities with machine precision. It has become essential for real-time risk management in modern trading systems. | The Bates model (1996) combines stochastic volatility and jump diffusion to capture both the volatility smile and the implied volatility skew observed in equity and currency option markets. It extends the Heston model by adding a Poisson jump component to returns, making it suitable for pricing options when sudden price moves are expected. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|