Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Testul rădăcinii unitare Fourier Phillips-Perron (PP Fourier)× | Testul Zivot-Andrews pentru Rupturi Structurale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Econometrie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2006 | 1992 |
| Autorul original≠ | Becker, Enders, and Lee | Eric Zivot and Donald W. K. Andrews |
| Tip≠ | Unit root test with Fourier approximation | Unit root test with endogenous structural break |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Enders, W., & Siklos, P. L. (2001). Cointegration and threshold adjustment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(2), 166-176. DOI ↗ | Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Fourier PP test, Flexible Fourier PP unit root test, Enders-Lee Fourier PP test, nonlinear PP unit root test | ZA test, Zivot-Andrews unit root test, endogenous structural break unit root test, ZA structural break test |
| Înrudite | 6 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Fourier PP unit root test extends the classical Phillips-Perron test by embedding low-frequency Fourier terms in the deterministic component, enabling the test to account for an unknown number of smooth, gradual structural breaks in the level or trend without pre-specifying their timing or shape. | The Zivot-Andrews (ZA) test is a unit root test that endogenously identifies the most likely location of a single structural break in a time series. Unlike the standard ADF test, it does not require the researcher to pre-specify when the break occurred, making it robust to data-driven regime shifts such as policy changes, financial crises, or major economic events. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|