Compară metode

	Estimare Dublu Robustă (AIPW)	Efecte de Tratament Eterogene (CATE / Meta-învățători)	Pădurea Aleatoare (Random Forest)
Domeniu	Inferență cauzală	Inferență cauzală	Învățare automată
Familie	Regression model	Regression model	Machine learning
Anul apariției	2005	2018	2001
Autorul original	Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins	Wager & Athey (causal forest); Künzel et al. (meta-learners)	Breiman, L.
Tip	Semiparametric causal estimator	Causal machine-learning framework	Ensemble (bagging of decision trees)
Sursa seminală	Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129.	Wager, S. & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association.	Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.
Denumiri alternative	AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)	conditional average treatment effect, CATE, meta-learners, causal forest	Rastgele Orman (Random Forest), rastgele orman, random decision forest, bagged tree ensemble
Înrudite	5	5	4
Rezumat	Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.	Heterogeneous Treatment Effects is a machine-learning framework that estimates how a treatment effect varies across individuals — the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). It bundles meta-learner strategies such as the T-Learner, S-Learner, X-Learner and R-Learner alongside the causal forest of Wager and Athey (2018) and Künzel et al. (2019).	Random Forest is an ensemble learning method, introduced by Leo Breiman in 2001, that grows many decision trees on bootstrap samples of the data and combines their votes to produce strong classification and regression. By pooling many slightly different trees, it produces more accurate and more stable predictions than any single tree.