ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Extensia Dual Hesitant Fuzzy a EDAS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției20231995
Autorul originalNing, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipDual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Sursa seminalăNing, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. (2023). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88
RezumatDHF-EDAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: DHF-EDAS · CRITIC. Preluat la 2026-06-18 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare