ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Extensia Dual Hesitant Fuzzy a EDAS×Metoda de ponderare obiectivă CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs)×
DomeniuLuarea deciziilorLuarea deciziilor
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Anul apariției20232016
Autorul originalNing, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipDual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Sursa seminalăNing, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. (2023). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Denumiri alternative
Înrudite88
RezumatDHF-EDAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: DHF-EDAS · CILOS. Preluat la 2026-06-18 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare