Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Testul binomial exact× | Test z pentru două proporții× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Statistică | Statistică |
| Familie≠ | Regression model | Hypothesis test |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1988 | 1900 |
| Autorul original≠ | Classical exact test; textbook treatment by Siegel & Castellan | Karl Pearson / classical large-sample z approximation |
| Tip≠ | Exact one-sample test for a proportion | Parametric proportion comparison |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070573574 | Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed.). Wiley. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | exact binomial test, binomial probability test, exact test for a proportion, Tam Binom Testi | z-test for proportions, two-sample proportion test, one-proportion z-test, Oran Testi — z Testi (Oranlar) |
| Înrudite≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The exact binomial test checks whether the observed number of successes in a fixed number of independent trials is consistent with a pre-specified success probability p₀. Because it computes exact binomial tail probabilities rather than relying on a normal approximation, it is the gold standard for testing a proportion in small samples; this two-sided formulation follows Siegel & Castellan's classic treatment (1988). | The proportion test (z-test for proportions) is a parametric hypothesis test that compares one or two sample proportions against a reference value or each other. Grounded in the large-sample normal approximation formalized by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (2003), it is the standard tool for binary outcome comparisons when samples are large enough for the central limit theorem to apply. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|